Bible Commentary on 2 Chronicles 19:6

Verse: “And said to the judges, Take heed what ye do: for ye judge not for man, but for the Lord, who is with you in the judgment.”

Introduction

This verse is a pivotal admonition to the judges in Israel, emphasizing the serious responsibility they bear in executing justice. As derived from the commentaries of Matthew Henry, Albert Barnes, and Adam Clarke, we gain a deeper understanding of the implications of divine judgment and the weight of authority entrusted to human judges.

Contextual Analysis

In the preceding chapters, Jehoshaphat, King of Judah, had established a system of judges throughout the land. His intent was to ensure that justice was administered fairly and in accordance with God’s law. Matthew Henry notes that this chapter follows after a significant alliance that Jehoshaphat made with Israel, which faced divine disapproval. Consequently, his emphasis on proper judgment served as a corrective measure.

Commentary Insights

Responsibility of Judges

Henry elaborates that the phrase "Take heed what ye do" serves as a direct command, urging judges to reflect earnestly on their duties. Their role is not merely to serve man, but to execute justice in God’s name. Albert Barnes highlights that this divine appointment elevates the act of judgment to a sacred duty, revealing that the judges must align their decisions with God’s will.

Divine Presence in Judgment

“For ye judge not for man, but for the Lord” underscores the idea that God is actively involved in the judicial process. Adam Clarke comments that this notion imparts a sense of awe and reverence for the responsibility they carry. Judges must consider that their judgments are not merely legal decisions, but they carry eternal implications.

Encouragement and Warning

Furthermore, the assurance "who is with you in the judgment" is both an encouragement and a warning. Henry suggests this indicates God’s support for just judgments and His presence with those who uphold His laws. In contrast, it serves as a warning that corruption or misjudgment would not go unnoticed.

Theological Reflections

The verse culminates in a profound understanding of the relationship between divine authority and human agency. Barnes suggests that this principle extends beyond the judges of ancient Israel and remains relevant for contemporary believers, particularly those in positions of leadership and authority. The weight of authority implies a duty to act in accordance with God’s justice.

Practical Applications

• For Pastors: This verse serves as a reminder to uphold justice in ministry and to guide congregants in engaging with moral and ethical dilemmas.
• For Students: Analyzing this scripture can foster a deeper appreciation for the responsibility of decision-making in various life contexts.
• For Theologians: It incites discussion on the intersection of divine sovereignty and human responsibility, promoting further exploration of God’s role in earthly governance.

Conclusion

2 Chronicles 19:6 offers critical insights into the nature of justice as a divine mandate. The combined perspectives from Henry, Barnes, and Clarke elucidate that judges — and, by extension, all individuals in authority — are reminded of their accountability before God. In administering justice, the act transcends mere human judgment and embodies a reflection of God’s righteousness in the world.