Commentary on 2 Corinthians 11:17
Verse: "That which I speak, I speak it not after the Lord, but as it were foolishly, in this confidence of boasting." (2 Corinthians 11:17)
Introduction
This verse forms a crucial part of Paul's rhetoric in his second letter to the Corinthians, particularly within a section where he defends his apostleship and ministry against those who undermine his authority. Paul openly differentiates his self-defense from divine revelation, suggesting that what follows may seem foolish but is necessary for robust clarification of his position.
Exegesis and Analysis
Paul’s assertion that he is not speaking "after the Lord" signals a transition from spiritual to human reasoning. His intent is not to diminish the truth of his message but rather to emphasize the cultural and contextual pressures influencing his words. This presents a significant aspect of Paul's approach: he aimed to reach his audience where they were, employing their vulnerabilities to fortify the faith.
Matthew Henry's Insights
-
Human Weakness: Matthew Henry observes that Paul recognizes the limitations of human wisdom in spiritual matters, noting that he was compelled to speak in a manner that might appear foolish to those wary of his authority. This reflects the paradox of the Gospel: divine wisdom often manifests through seemingly foolish means.
-
Context of Boasting: Henry highlights the context of boasting in Paul’s message. He does not boast in the Lord’s strength but rather in his own weaknesses and experiences, knowing that God's grace is made perfect in human frailty (2 Corinthians 12:9).
-
Contrast with False Apostles: Henry also points out that Paul’s self-defense is set against the backdrop of false teachers who boasted in their abilities and revelations. The apostle uses this contrast to affirm his authenticity and integrity as a servant of Christ.
Albert Barnes' Commentary
-
Divine Inspiration vs. Human Logic: Barnes elaborates on Paul’s delineation between divine wisdom and human reasoning. He notes that by stating he does not speak "after the Lord," Paul demonstrates his understanding of the complexity involved in communicating spiritual truths amidst human logic and societal norms.
-
Calling Out the Boastings: Additionally, Barnes contextualizes Paul’s remarks by examining the nature of boasting within the Corinthian church. He indicates that Paul’s humility contrasts sharply with the arrogance displayed by some of the church members, emphasizing the importance of authenticity in Christian leadership.
-
Bias in Perception: Barnes also warns about how perceptions of wisdom or foolishness may be skewed by the cultural and social biases of the audience. Paul’s declaration implies a rejection of theCredentials of worldly wisdom, positioning himself firmly within the framework of Christ’s humility and sacrifice.
-
Implications for Leadership: The implications for leadership are profound, as leaders must navigate the treacherous waters of presenting their experiences and credentials without veering into arrogance or self-sufficiency.
Adam Clarke's Reflection
-
Missionary Approach: Adam Clarke reflects on Paul's missionary approach, noting that sometimes, for the sake of the Gospel, it is necessary to employ rhetoric that may not come from a place of divine revelation but rather from a site of strategic engagement with the audience’s understanding.
-
Cultural Sensitivity: Clarke stresses the importance of cultural sensitivity in ministry, suggesting that while Paul admits the potential foolishness of his statements, he embraces this as part of his commitment to making the truth accessible to the Corinthians.
-
Vulnerability in Ministry: Clarke also highlights the theme of vulnerability in Paul’s ministry, suggesting that the apostle's willingness to reveal his weaknesses serves as an encouragement for others to embrace their own, providing a model of humility for contemporary leaders and believers alike.
Theological Implications
2 Corinthians 11:17 invites a deeper exploration of how believers are called to communicate truth amid cultural opposition and misunderstanding. The verse serves as a reminder that the Gospel often runs contrary to human expectations of wisdom and success.
Authenticity in Leadership
In striving for authenticity, leaders are encouraged to reflect Paul’s willingness to be transparent about his process and experiences. It highlights the necessity of embracing weakness while remaining confident in God's strength and authority.
Faith vs. Reasoning
The balance of faith and reasoning is essential in theology. Paul’s differentiation between speaking "after the Lord" and his own rhetoric implies faith being tested and expressed through personal experience and context. This relates to the broader theological conversation regarding the integration of faith and reason in the life of believers.
Conclusion
In conclusion, 2 Corinthians 11:17 encapsulates a pivotal moment of self-defense in Paul’s epistolary mission. It calls scholars, pastors, and students to explore the depths of apostolic humility as a response to the challenges of ministry. Embracing one’s vulnerabilities amidst the cultural challenges opens pathways for authentic expressions of faith, encouraging believers to speak fearlessly about the Gospel and their journeys in faith, despite the appearances of foolishness.
