Commentary on 2 Samuel 11:27

2 Samuel 11:27 reads: "And when the mourning was past, David sent and fetched her to his house, and she became his wife and bare him a son. But the thing that David had done displeased the Lord."

Introduction

This verse concludes the tragic narrative of David's sin with Bathsheba, emphasizing the consequence of sin, the sovereignty of God, and the moral decline that can come even to those whom God has chosen. The insights provided by public domain commentaries from Matthew Henry, Albert Barnes, and Adam Clarke provide a multi-faceted understanding of this poignant passage.

The Context of the Passage

Before we delve deeper into its implications, it is crucial to understand the context. David, a man after God’s own heart, fell deeply into sin through his illicit relationship with Bathsheba. The narrative not only chronicles the act but also its repercussions, showcasing the weight of sin and divine judgment.

Analysis of Key Phrases

• "When the mourning was past": This phrase indicates the customary period of mourning after Uriah's death. David’s action after this period suggests a calculated and morally troubling transition from tragedy to his own self-interest.
• "Fetched her to his house": David's act of bringing Bathsheba into his household illustrates his disregard for the sanctity of marriage, for Uriah had been a loyal soldier. This action marks a deepening of David's sin.
• "She became his wife": This indicates a formalization of sin. David attempts to legitimize his sinful relationship, further entrenching himself in moral failure.
• "And bare him a son": The birth of a son appears to provide a semblance of blessing; however, it is a stark reminder of how sin can bear fruit. Yet, it should be noted that this child would not survive, highlighting the tragic outcomes of David's actions.
• "But the thing that David had done displeased the Lord": This declaration sets the tone for the moral gravity of the passage. It crystallizes the reality that God’s judgment is inevitable and serves as the crux of the warning against sin.

Theological Insights

Each commentator addresses the theological ramifications of this verse, emphasizing God’s displeasure and the ethical implications of David’s actions.

Matthew Henry

Matthew Henry emphasizes that David's sin was particularly egregious given his position as king. He viewed David’s act of fetching Bathsheba as an egregious misuse of power. Henry notes, “How dreadful is the fall of the man after God’s own heart!” He describes the moment as a turning point, where the king minimizes the moral law of God for personal gain. Henry expands on the idea that God, while patient, does not ignore sin and will hold His people accountable for their actions.

Albert Barnes

Albert Barnes reflects on the nature of sin coming to fruition. He suggests that David’s intentions to cover his tracks through marriage were futile against God’s omniscience. Barnes poignantly comments, “No sin can be hidden from God; we may deceive ourselves and others, but not the Almighty.” His comments urge readers to recognize the seriousness of sin even in the post-justification era, where it can lead to unrecognized depths of moral failure.

Adam Clarke

Adam Clarke discusses the psychological aspect of David’s actions. Clarke points out that David rationalized his sin and allowed himself to be consumed by desire. He asserts that the aftermath of sin is often a false sense of security, where individuals may feel justified. Clarke concludes that God's displeasure is not only about punishment but also derails the experience of peace in our souls.

Lessons for Believers

This narrative holds timeless lessons for contemporary believers and church leaders:

• The reality of human frailty: Even the most faithful can falter, reminding us of the need for vigilance and accountability in spiritual life.
• The grievous nature of sin: Sin has ramifications beyond personal consequence; it affects relationships, communities, and our relationship with God.
• God’s displeasure is inevitable: Sin cannot coexist with God’s holiness. Recognition of this truth is essential for spiritual health.
• Regret without repentance: While David experienced regret, as noted later in the scriptures, true repentance involves turning away from sin, not just feeling sorry for its consequences.
• God's mercy amid judgment: Despite David's failures, God’s redemptive plan continued. The lineage of David leads to Christ, illustrating the profound themes of grace and the possibility of redemption.

Conclusion

2 Samuel 11:27 encapsulates a critical moment in biblical history, underscoring many profound truths about sin, power, and God’s justice. The implications draw clear lines for personal reflection and communal teaching. In understanding the gravity of David's actions through the insights of esteemed commentators, pastors and theologians can gain profound wisdom in guiding their congregations to a deeper appreciation of God's holiness and grace.