Matthew Henry’s Commentary

Matthew Henry highlights the existential difficulties faced by humanity. He emphasizes that despite the abundance of good that God provides, there are things that lead to futility and dissatisfaction. He interprets the "evil" mentioned in this verse as relating to the experiences of individuals who possess wealth or enjoy life's pleasures but lack the ability to enjoy them fully due to the brevity and uncertainty of life.

• The Nature of the Evil: Henry suggests that this evil reflects a broader theme of disappointment, particularly in the inability to enjoy the gifts given by God.
• The Commonality Among Men: He notes that this condition is prevalent, indicating that no one is immune to the existential plight of unfulfilled desires or the emptiness that can accompany great wealth.

Albert Barnes’ Notes

Albert Barnes elaborates on the idea of "evil" in Ecclesiastes 6:1, interpreting it as a form of injustice or disappointment prevalent in life. His analysis underscores the paradoxes of prosperity and contentment.

• Wealth and Contentment: Barnes points out that having wealth doesn't guarantee joy or satisfaction. Wealth often leads to greater anxiety and dissatisfaction.
• Reflective Nature of Life: He encourages readers to reflect on the brevity and transience of life, urging them to consider how they perceive wealth and enjoyments.

Adam Clarke’s Commentary

Adam Clarke approaches this verse with a focus on the observation of life’s unfairness and the mystery that surrounds the fate of man. His reflections resonate with the existential themes that permeate the text of Ecclesiastes.

• The Discrepancy of Life: Clarke emphasizes that there are many injustices that appear to contradict the notion of a just God, exemplified in this verse by those who suffer despite their righteousness.
• Questioning Prosperity: Clarke articulates a deep concern about the futility of human endeavors when viewed through the lens of mortality and divine judgment.