Matthew Henry's Commentary

According to Matthew Henry, this passage reflects God's severe judgment against Edom due to their persistent hostility towards Israel. Henry notes that Edom's fall is a demonstration of God's power over the nations that oppress His chosen people. The mention of "man and beast" being cut off indicates total desolation, portraying the extent of divine retribution.

Henry emphasizes the particularity of God’s judgment, where even the once-thriving cities and natural resources of Edom will be made desolate. This serves as a warning to all who oppose God's people, emphasizing the principles of divine justice and the consequences of enmity against the Lord's covenant household.

Albert Barnes' Notes on the Bible

Albert Barnes expounds upon the imagery of desolation in Ezekiel 25:13. He explains that the destruction of Edom is portrayed with vivid language, indicating a complete eradication of life within its borders. Barnes points out that the reference to Teman and Dedan highlights specific geographic locations that were significant to Edom. Teman, known for its wise men, and Dedan, notable for its commerce, reflect the practical implications of judgment where even wisdom and wealth will not spare the nation from God’s wrath.

Furthermore, Barnes notes the prophetic significance of this judgment, as it points towards the fulfillment of God's broader plan to restore Israel. By dismantling the enemies of God’s people, He signals the eventual restoration and exaltation of Israel, which is a key theme in Ezekiel's prophecies.

Adam Clarke's Commentary

Adam Clarke provides an insightful analysis of the language used in this verse, noting the starkness of the imagery. He elucidates that God's declaration to "make it desolate" indicates not only physical destruction but also a spiritual desolation—a consequence of rejecting God. Clarke categorizes Edom's pride and enmity towards Israel as significant factors leading to its downfall. The message serves as a theological reflection on the nature of sin and rebellion against God.

Clarke further emphasizes the historic enmity between Edom and Israel, interpreting Edom's actions during Israel’s hardships as deeply ingrained sin that warranted such divine retribution. His commentary invites readers to consider the broader narrative of redemption, demonstrating that while judgment may come, it is ultimately in the service of God’s redemptive purposes for His people.