Mark 9:5 KJV

And Peter answered and said to Jesus, Master, it is good for us to be here: and let us make three tabernacles; one for thee, and one for Moses, and one for Elias.

Previous Verse
« Mark 9:4
Next Verse
Mark 9:6 »

Mark 9:5 Bible Commentary

Commentary on Mark 9:5

Scripture Reference: Mark 9:5 - "And Peter answered and said to Jesus, 'Rabbi, it is good for us to be here; and let us make three tabernacles; one for You, one for Moses, and one for Elijah'—because he did not know what to say, for they were greatly afraid."

Introduction

This verse occurs within the context of the Transfiguration of Jesus, an event rich in theological significance and a revealing moment of divine glory. To grasp the importance of Peter's response, we must understand the emotions and implications presented in the passage. In this commentary, insights from Matthew Henry, Albert Barnes, and Adam Clarke will be synthesized to explore the implications of Peter's statement and the overall message of Mark 9:5.

Context of the Passage

The transfiguration followed the teaching of Jesus concerning His suffering and death. Mark 9:1-4 sets the stage by indicating that some of those present would not taste death until they saw the Kingdom of God come with power. The disciples are invited to see a glimpse of Christ’s glory before journeying into His impending passion.

Insight from Matthew Henry

Peter's Response: Matthew Henry remarks on Peter's instinctive reaction, highlighting that his suggestion, though well-meaning, was misguided. Peter desired to prolong the experience of divine presence and glory but failed to grasp its temporal nature. This reflects a common human reaction to overwhelm in the presence of God; believers often seek to retain or encapsulate such experiences. However, as Henry points out, it is crucial that we acknowledge that these divine revelations are not meant for permanent dwelling but rather for profound encounters that lead to transformation.

The Symbolism of Tabernacles: The three tabernacles Peter proposed symbolize an attempt to structure and contain a divine experience. Henry elucidates that this notion is flawed; God’s glory cannot be contained within human constructs. Instead, the focus should remain on Christ—the fulfillment of the law represented by Moses and the prophets represented by Elijah.

Insights from Albert Barnes

The Nature of Fear: Albert Barnes notes that Peter's fear led to a hasty assertion—a common phenomenon when faced with the divine. His suggestion to build three tabernacles may have stemmed from a desire to honor Jesus, Moses, and Elijah collectively. Barnes argues that this impulse reveals the struggle humans face when trying to balance reverence with the desire for stability in the presence of the divine.

Understanding the Import of Moses and Elijah: Additionally, Barnes emphasizes the significance of Moses and Elijah in this context. They represent the Law and the Prophets, serving as a divine affirmation of Jesus' ministry and identity. Peter’s desire to build tabernacles equally for them reflects the mistaken equivalence between Christ and these two great figures of the Old Testament, indicating a superficial understanding of who Jesus truly is.

Insights from Adam Clarke

Peter's Lack of Understanding: Adam Clarke provides a thorough examination of Peter's mental state. He highlights that Peter’s statement originated from confusion and a lack of comprehension about the monumental significance of the moment. Clarke indicates that divine experiences often leave believers in overwhelming awe, which can induce speechlessness.

Theological Implication of the Tabernacles: Clarke further explains that the idea of creating shelters reflects a desire to claim a moment that is intended to be fleeting. He notes the danger of attempting to contain divine experiences in familiar structures which may distract from the true worship of God. Such actions risk placing spiritual leaders on par with Jesus, which could lead to theological misinterpretations and the worship of creations rather than the Creator.

Theological Reflection

Throughout the insights of Henry, Barnes, and Clarke, a shared theme emerges: the challenge of human response to divine revelation. In this verse, we see the beautiful yet complex interplay of glory, fear, and misunderstanding that characterizes human interaction with God. This serves as a reminder to pastors, theologians, and scholars to approach moments of spiritual significance with both reverence and an awareness of the proper order of worship.

Applications for Believers

  • Emphasize Divine Centrality: Just as Peter's suggestion was misguided, contemporary believers must avoid the temptation to elevate any servant of God above Christ. Worship should be directed solely toward Jesus, who brings fulfillment to the Law and Prophets.
  • Recognizing Moments of Glory: The transfiguration experience encourages believers to acknowledge and embrace divine encounters, but recognize their purpose as transformative rather than permanent. Reflect on how these experiences drive personal growth and spiritual development.
  • Reflect on Responses to Fear: Peter’s fearful response demonstrates the need for mature spiritual discernment in the face of God's majesty. Believers should seek to understand their emotions in moments of divine presence and respond with respect and a desire for deeper insight rather than hasty actions.

Conclusion

Mark 9:5 serves as a potent reminder of the complexities present in human engagement with the divine. The commentaries from Henry, Barnes, and Clarke elucidate Peter's moment of misunderstanding—a reflection of a broader human tendency to misplace focus amid extraordinary experiences. As believers engage with scriptures, it is crucial to remain anchored in the truth of Christ's supremacy, recognizing His glory while avoiding the pitfalls of misinterpretation and misplaced worship.