Commentary on 1 Samuel 28:6

Verse Text: "And when Saul enquired of the LORD, the LORD answered him not, neither by dreams, nor by Urim, nor by prophets."

Introduction

This passage from 1 Samuel 28:6 reveals a crucial moment in the life of King Saul. He is faced with fear and uncertainty as he prepares for battle against the Philistines and seeks divine guidance, yet finds that God remains silent. This commentary will explore the implications of divine silence, the significance of Saul's actions, and the broader themes of leadership, disobedience, and the quest for guidance in the life of a believer.

Contextual Background

To fully grasp the significance of this verse, it’s imperative to consider the background of Saul’s reign.

• Historical Setting: Saul was the first king of Israel, appointed by God through the prophet Samuel. However, his reign was marked by disobedience to God's commands.
• Divine Rejection: Earlier in 1 Samuel, God rejected Saul as king due to his continual rebellion against divine instruction, as highlighted in 1 Samuel 15.
• Spiritual Decline: The absence of divine guidance in Saul's life reflects his spiritual decline and estrangement from God.

Commentary Insights

1. Saul's Appeal for Guidance

According to Matthew Henry, Saul’s decision to inquire of the Lord indicates a deep-seated panic and desperation as his enemies draw near. Unlike previous instances where God communicated directly with Saul, here, Saul’s inquiry leads to an unsettling silence.

2. The Means of Inquiry

Three Methods of Divine Communication: In his quest for answers, Saul employs three typical methods of seeking counsel from God:

• Dreams: God often communicated through dreams in the Scriptures, providing insight and direction.
• Urim and Thummim: These were sacred objects used by the priests to discern God’s will (Exodus 28:30); however, they are silent in this instance.
• Prophets: Saul had previously received guidance from the prophet Samuel, but now he finds himself without a prophet to intercede.

3. The Silence of God

Both Adam Clarke and Albert Barnes comment on the profound implications of God’s silence. The failure of God to respond serves as a stark warning of the consequences of turning away from Him:

• A Mark of Judgment: The absence of divine response is interpreted as a judgment upon Saul for his previous transgressions.
• Spiritual Reality: This silence emphasizes a spiritual reality where persistent disobedience leads to estrangement from God.

4. Theological Implications

1 Samuel 28:6 encapsulates profound theological themes significant for reflection.

• Human Agency: Saul’s inquiry underscores the human desire for divine direction, especially in crises, highlighting the search for understanding beyond the immediate circumstances.
• God’s Sovereignty: The silence serves as a reminder of God’s sovereignty in choosing when and how to reveal His will. He is not obliged to respond merely because one seeks answers.
• Repentance and Restoration: Saul's predicament illustrates the dire need for repentance and reconnection with God, an essential theme in biblical theology.

Application for Ministries and Personal Growth

This verse speaks directly to pastors, students, theologians, and believers regarding how they understand and seek God's guidance:

• Reflect on Past Disobedience: Acknowledge areas of disobedience that may lead to a perceived distance from God.
• Seek Genuine Communication: Understand that seeking God’s voice is not merely about employing traditional methods but engaging in sincere relationship and obedience.
• Embrace Silence: Learn to trust God in silence, recognizing it may serve a purpose in His divine plan.

Conclusion

1 Samuel 28:6 is a poignant reminder of the complexities of divine communication and human expectation. Saul’s tragic search for guidance in a moment of crisis illuminates the serious consequences of a life disconnected from God. For the believer, it encourages a deeper examination of one’s heart and the necessity for continuous engagement with God’s will, emphasizing that true communication necessitates commitment and fidelity to God’s path.