2 Kings 18:10 KJV

And at the end of three years they took it: even in the sixth year of Hezekiah, that is in the ninth year of Hoshea king of Israel, Samaria was taken.

Previous Verse
« 2 Kings 18:9
Next Verse
2 Kings 18:11 »

2 Kings 18:10 Bible Commentary

Commentary on 2 Kings 18:10

Verse: "And it came to pass, in the third year of Hoshea son of Elah king of Israel, that Shalmaneser king of Assyria came up against Samaria, and besieged it."

Introduction

The passage of 2 Kings 18:10 marks a significant moment in the history of Israel. It is set during a time when the northern kingdom of Israel was under siege by Shalmaneser, king of Assyria. This commentary seeks to draw upon the insights of revered biblical scholars such as Matthew Henry, Adam Clarke, and Albert Barnes, to elucidate the theological, historical, and prophetic implications of this verse.

Historical Context

Scholarly Insight: The context of this verse is one of turmoil and divine judgment. During the reign of Hoshea, Israel continued in idolatry and turned away from the LORD. This state led to its inevitable downfall. Assyria, as an instrument of God's judgment, besieged Samaria, the capital city of the northern kingdom.

  • Matthew Henry: In his commentary, Henry highlights the disobedience of Israel as the root cause of their suffering. He writes that the people of Israel had strayed from true worship, resulting in divine abandonment.
  • Albert Barnes: Barnes notes the significance of the third year of Hoshea's reign. He posits that this date should be viewed not just as a chronological marker but as a moment indicative of the fullness of time for divine judgment.
  • Adam Clarke: Clarke offers a philological perspective, examining the Hebrew terms used for ‘besieged’ and their implications. He explains that besieging carries connotations of desperation and hopelessness, reflecting the dire straits of Israel.

Theological Implications

Judgment and Discipline: The act of besieging Samaria speaks volumes about God's judgment upon a nation that persistently rejects His covenant. Theologically, this introduces the complex relationship between divine sovereignty and human responsibility.

  • Matthew Henry: He emphasizes that God's judgment is often a necessary aspect of His holiness. Disobedience is met with consequences, operating within the framework of God's covenant relationship with Israel.
  • Albert Barnes: Barnes elucidates the role of Assyria as a means of God's discipline. He suggests that the Assyrians were not just conquerors; they were used by God to fulfill His sovereign plan.
  • Adam Clarke: Clarke encourages a reflective approach to this verse by considering its implications for contemporary believers. He expresses that God's patience should not embolden sin; instead, it should lead to repentance.

Prophetic Significance

This verse stands as a fulfillable prophecy of judgment, as indicated by prior prophetic warnings, particularly through the ministry of prophets like Amos and Hosea. Their voices were often disregarded, but the consequence of this would soon be revealed.

  • Matthew Henry: Henry points out that God's word through the prophets must be honored; otherwise, the consequences are inevitable. The impending siege serves as a chilling reminder to heed divine warnings.
  • Albert Barnes: Barnes reflects that the siege of Samaria is a visible representation of the spiritual blindness of Israel. They failed to realize that the threats of Assyria were not merely political but also divine enactments.
  • Adam Clarke: Clarke contextualizes the siege within the broader biblical narrative of God’s persistent call to repentance, reminding readers that history often repeats itself when divine truths are neglected.

Lessons for Modern Believers

The narrative surrounding 2 Kings 18:10 provides rich applications for pastors, students, and scholars today. It invites reflection on the nature of sin, judgment, and the necessity of genuine repentance.

  • Awareness of Idolatry: The Israelites' idolatry is a stark reminder of the dangers of straying from God. Today, the challenge remains to identify and forsake modern idols that may lead us away from authentic worship.
  • Divine Sovereignty: The events leading to the siege illustrate that God is sovereign over the nations. Believers are called to trust in God's ultimate authority, even amidst turmoil.
  • Call to Repentance: As the people of Israel faced grave consequences for their actions, believers today are reminded of the urgent need to repent and align their lives with God's will.

Conclusion

In conclusion, 2 Kings 18:10 is not just a historical record; it embodies profound truths about divine judgment, human agency, and the prophetic voice of God. Insights from the commentaries of Matthew Henry, Albert Barnes, and Adam Clarke enrich our understanding and point towards the relevance of this ancient text for contemporary faith. As we explore the depths of God's Word, may we be continually reminded of His holiness, righteousness, and steadfast love amidst the complexities of life.