Old Testament
Genesis Exodus Leviticus Numbers Deuteronomy Joshua Judges Ruth 1 Samuel 2 Samuel 1 Kings 2 Kings 1 Chronicles 2 Chronicles Ezra Nehemiah Esther Job Psalms Proverbs Ecclesiastes Song of Solomon Isaiah Jeremiah Lamentations Ezekiel Daniel Hosea Joel Amos Obadiah Jonah Micah Nahum Habakkuk Zephaniah Haggai Zechariah MalachiJob 13:19
Job 13:19 KJV
Who is he that will plead with me? for now, if I hold my tongue, I shall give up the ghost.
Job 13:19 Bible Commentary
Commentary on Job 13:19
Job 13:19 (KJV): "Who is he that will plead with me? for now, if I hold my tongue, I shall give up the ghost."
Introduction
The verse encapsulates Job's deep turmoil and his profound desire to understand the justice of God amid his suffering. Commentaries from renowned scholars such as Matthew Henry, Albert Barnes, and Adam Clarke provide layered insights into this verse, shedding light on Job's mindset during this critical moment.
Job's Plea for Understanding
Job’s Context: At this stage in the narrative, Job is responding to his friends who have criticized him, asserting that his suffering is a result of hidden sin. In Job 13:19, he passionately challenges the notion that he is at fault and expresses his desire for a true advocate before God.
Matthew Henry observes: Job's question implies a sense of isolation in his suffering. He is aware that he cannot maintain silence when injustice is being done to him. His plea reveals his desire for clarity and resolution to his trials.
The Role of Advocacy
Albert Barnes adds: This verse highlights Job's feeling of abandonment and longing for someone to intercede on his behalf. He is searching for a mediator who will plead his case, reflecting a timeless theme of humanity's need for divine intercession.
- Human Limitations: Barnes points out that Job realizes his limitations in understanding God’s will, recognizing that human reasoning is inadequate in the face of divine sovereignty.
- Desperation for Defense: Job’s assertion that he would “give up the ghost” emphasizes his desperation; without an advocate, he feels he cannot endure his torment.
Theological Implications
Adam Clarke elaborates: This plea reflects a deeper theological truth. Job’s struggle is not merely against his friends’ accusations but against the very nature of suffering and divine justice.
- Imputation of Guilt: Clarke notes that Job challenges the incorrect assumptions held by his friends about accountability and divine punishment. Job asserts his innocence despite his afflictions.
- A Foreshadowing of Christ: Some theologians suggest that Job’s longing for an intercessor foreshadows the ultimate advocacy provided by Jesus Christ, who stands as the mediator between God and man.
Job’s Final Appeal
Henry comments on the gravity of Job's situation, stating that he is at a pivotal crossroads. His desire to speak with God is palpable, and he is prepared to confront Him directly, which demonstrates a blend of fear, reverence, and faith.
- Confronting God: Job’s willingness to speak directly to God signifies a relationship where he seeks answers rather than resignation.
- Faith in Dialogue: There is an implicit faith in Job's approach; he believes that dialogue with God is possible and necessary for his spiritual survival.
Conclusion
In Job 13:19, we find the anguish of a man caught in the web of suffering, yet yearning for truth and justice. The combined insights from Matthew Henry, Albert Barnes, and Adam Clarke resonate deeply with the struggles faced by many when reconciling personal pain with theological beliefs. Pastors, students, and scholars alike can draw from Job's profound plea for advocacy and understanding as they navigate their own crises of faith and seek a deeper relationship with God.