Job 22:17 KJV

Which said unto God, Depart from us: and what can the Almighty do for them?

Previous Verse
« Job 22:16
Next Verse
Job 22:18 »

Job 22:17 Bible Commentary

Commentary on Job 22:17

Verse: Job 22:17 - "Which said unto God, Depart from us; and what can the Almighty do for them?"

Introduction

This verse from the Book of Job is spoken by Eliphaz, one of Job's friends, in a lengthy discourse aimed at explaining Job's misfortunes. The context of this passage is crucial, as it not only reflects Eliphaz's understanding of divine justice but also reveals the prevailing misconceptions regarding God's providence and human suffering.

Historical Context

The Book of Job is set in a period that deals with the age-old question of theodicy, which seeks to reconcile the existence of evil and suffering in the world with an all-powerful and benevolent God. Eliphaz’s remarks are indicative of a retributive theology that suggests punishment is a direct consequence of sin. This commentary draws insights from various public domain sources to deepen our understanding of Eliphaz's statement and its implications for theology today.

Interpretation of Eliphaz's Statement

Eliphaz's assertion that the wicked would claim, "Depart from us," suggests a rejection of God's authority and a distancing from divine accountability. Matthew Henry interprets this verse as illustrating the profound folly of distancing oneself from the Almighty, underscoring the idea that such rejection leads to moral and spiritual devastation.

Albert Barnes expands upon this notion, emphasizing the self-deception of those who believe they can live without divine oversight. He argues that to shun God is ultimately to embrace chaos and despair, as humanity cannot thrive apart from its Creator.

Theological Reflections

Retributive Justice: The primary theme in this discourse is retributive justice— the belief that suffering is directly correlated to sin. Eliphaz assumes Job's afflictions are due to his wrongdoing, which Barnes vehemently contests, highlighting that afflictions can occur for reasons beyond human comprehension, such as divine testing or a mystery known only to God.

The Nature of God: Clarke notes that God's sovereignty allows Him to act beyond human expectations. The Almighty does not exist to fulfill human whims. Instead, God's ways transcend human understanding and often defy the simplistic cause-and-effect mentality that Eliphaz implies.

Human Rebellion Against God

Eliphaz’s reference to those who say “Depart from us” reflects a broader theme of human rebellion. Matthew Henry suggests that such statements arise from a heart filled with pride and a desire to operate independently of God’s influence. This perspective is a timeless challenge faced by humanity— to resist the pull of self-sufficiency and to acknowledge one's dependence on divine grace.

The Consequences of Rejection

Eliphaz's statement prompts contemplation about the consequences of rejecting God. Clarke highlights that forsaking the Almighty leads to separation from the source of life and blessing. Such rejection not only affects one's relationship with God but also impacts one's community and the wider society.

This aligns with the broader biblical narrative where the joy and sustenance found in a relationship with God are vital to human flourishing, both individually and communally.

Lessons for Contemporary Believers

  • The Centrality of God: Just as Eliphaz emphasized God’s power, contemporary believers must recognize the centrality of God in every aspect of life. Rejecting divine authority leads to moral decay, whereas reliance on God fosters growth and stability.
  • Understanding Suffering: The dialogues in Job challenge believers to reassess their understanding of suffering. Barnes points out that not all suffering is a result of sin. Believers must embrace mystery and trust in God's purpose amidst trials.
  • The Call to Repentance: Eliphaz’s remarks can serve as a warning. Pastors and theologians might emphasize the importance of heeding God’s calling and maintaining a posture of humility before Him, as pride often precedes downfall.

Conclusion

Job 22:17 serves as a vital reminder of the pitfalls of rejecting God's sovereignty. Eliphaz's perspective, while reflective of common theological viewpoints of his time, reveals deeper truths about the struggles of faith. Considering insights from Matthew Henry, Albert Barnes, and Adam Clarke augments our understanding of God's unwavering presence amidst human suffering. For modern believers, this calls for a renewed commitment to God, encouraging a trust that transcends circumstances and deepens faith in His unfathomable wisdom.