Matthew Henry's Commentary

Matthew Henry draws attention to the precise nature of the allotment and the significance of each city named in this verse. He notes that the careful listing of towns serves to document the fulfillment of God's promise to the Israelites.

• Historical Context: Eltekon is referred to as a lesser-known city, highlighting the importance of all settlements in the fulfillment of God's design for the people of Israel.
• Symbolic Representation: Each city mentioned symbolizes the broader scope of God’s faithfulness in providing land to the tribes. This reminds readers of God’s commitment to His covenant with Abraham.
• Implication for the Tribe of Dan: Henry emphasizes that the allotment reflects not just a geographical distribution, but the spiritual inheritance tied to the land, which carries implications for identity and worship among the tribes.

Albert Barnes' Commentary

Albert Barnes provides a detailed analysis of the geographical significance of the cities mentioned. His commentary suggests that Gibbethon, notably, was a Levitical city, which underlines the integration of sacred spaces into everyday life for the tribes.

• Geographical Significance: Barnes points out the strategic placement of these cities and how they served to guard the varied entrances into Israel's territories, thereby being important for both trade and military defense.
• Religious Meaning: The mention of Baalath, a name associated with idol worship, indicates the challenges the Israelites would face regarding fidelity to God, setting the stage for the later historical conflicts depicted in the books of Kings.
• Application for Modern Believers: Barnes stresses the understanding that believers today are called to be conscious of where they dwell spiritually and to maintain a faithful witness, as those in the Old Testament were expected to do.

Adam Clarke's Commentary

Adam Clarke approaches the text with a linguist's eye, delving into the etymology of the names Eltekon, Gibbethon, and Baalath, emphasizing their meanings and significance.

• Meaning of Names: Clarke explains that Eltekon may refer to “God has made,” suggesting a divine purpose. Gibbethon can mean “hill,” depicting a natural fortress, while Baalath reflects the ongoing struggle with idolatry.
• Theological Implications: The naming reflects God's sovereignty in mapping out the elements of life for the Israelites—redeeming them from slavery yet guiding them into challenges of faithfulness and worship.
• Encouragement for Spiritual Growth: Clarke concludes that the careful recording of these cities encourages believers to seek understanding of their spiritual heritage and to examine their paths as directed by God.