Commentary on Joshua 22:26

Joshua 22:26 reads:

"Therefore we said, Let us now prepare to build us an altar, not for burnt offering, nor for sacrifice."

This verse is situated within a significant moment in the narrative where the tribes of Reuben, Gad, and the half-tribe of Manasseh return to their inheritance east of the Jordan River after the Israelite conquest of Canaan. Their actions and intentions in building an altar provoke a critical dialogue that underscores themes of unity, worship, and fidelity to God's covenant.

Contextual Background

The historical and cultural context of Joshua 22:26 is critical for understanding its implications. The eastern tribes, having fulfilled their commitment to assist in the conquest of Canaan, sought to establish their identity and connection to the central worship of Yahweh. Their construction of an altar is not merely an act of defiance; rather, it represents an earnest attempt to maintain a relationship with God amid cultural and geographical separation from the other tribes.

Insights from Public Domain Commentaries

Matthew Henry's Commentary

Matthew Henry emphasizes the importance of understanding intentions behind the actions of the Israelite tribes. He notes that the eastern tribes were concerned about the potential for their children to be excluded from the worship practices of the rest of Israel due to their geographical separation. Thus, the altar was intended as a symbol of their faith and inclusion within the communal worship, rather than a place for sacrifices, which could lead to confusion regarding their loyalty to the God of Israel.

Albert Barnes' Commentary

Albert Barnes provides further insight into the motivations of the tribes involved. He highlights that the altar, described as a “witness” rather than a place for offerings, was a proactive measure taken to prevent spiritual division. By building a monument, they aimed to convey their allegiance to the faith of their fathers and their continuous commitment to worshiping the one true God. Barnes stresses that their actions must be viewed as a protective gesture against future misunderstandings among the Israelite community.

Adam Clarke's Commentary

Adam Clarke delves into the theological implications of the altar they built. He points out that the altar serves as an unequivocal declaration of their intention to follow God. Clarke remarks that the refusal to offer burnt offerings and sacrifices upon this altar further clarifies their devotion to God as fundamentally rooted in an understanding of covenant fidelity—misunderstanding and conflict are avoided by asserting their intentions clearly from the outset.

Theological Significance

This passage raises several crucial theological themes:

• The Importance of Unity: The act of building an altar signifies a desire for unity in worship, highlighting that divergence in physical location does not equate to a divergence in spiritual fidelity.
• Identity and Legacy: There is a deep concern for the identity of future generations; the altar symbolizes continuity and a binding commitment to the covenant relationship established by God.
• Worship and Sacrifice: The distinction between an altar for sacrifices and one for a witness highlights the relationship between external acts of worship and internal faithfulness. It raises questions regarding the nature of true worship within the community of faith.

Practical Applications for Contemporary Readers

For pastors, theologians, and students of scripture, Joshua 22:26 offers several applications:

• Reflection on Intention: The emphasis on why we engage in communal or corporate acts of worship is profound. Engaging with one's community to ensure mission alignment calls for thoughtful consideration likewise, aligning practices and beliefs to avoid future conflicts.
• Preserving Unity in Diversity: In modern contexts where different interpretations and practices exist, fostering unity across diversity becomes essential. This verse illustrates the importance of embracing differences while strengthening communal faith.
• Commitment to the Covenant: Reaffirming our commitment to God involves actions that reflect our deepest values and beliefs, much like the tribes sought to do with their altar—a practical expression of faith that acknowledges and respects the past while looking forward to future generations.

Conclusion

Joshua 22:26 stands as an instructive passage that highlights the significance of intentions behind our actions in the service of God. The altar built by the eastern tribes serves as a powerful symbol of unity, a commitment to God, and the importance of communication within the community. The insights drawn from Matthew Henry, Albert Barnes, and Adam Clarke remind us of the depth and complexity of this short verse, urging us to seek greater understanding of our collective faith journey. As we examine our faith practices, may we emulate the desire for unity and fidelity expressed in this scripture.