Commentary on Numbers 26:56
Bible Verse: "According to the lot shall the possession thereof be divided between many and few." (Numbers 26:56)
Introduction
This verse falls within the context of the census conducted by Moses and Aaron, as directed by God, in preparation for the Israelites' entrance into the Promised Land. The significance of this verse lies in the divine principle of distribution and possession among the tribes of Israel, emphasizing God’s sovereignty and justice in allotting land. Throughout biblical history, God’s allocation reflects deeper theological mysteries and societal structures. The following commentary synthesizes insights from respected public domain commentaries to illuminate this verse.
Understanding the Context
In Numbers 26, the Israelites are numbered for a second time after the first census taken in the wilderness. This serves both administrative and theological purposes, as it reflects the growth, unity, and preparation of the people for entering Canaan. The lots cast for possessing the land demonstrate the method God used to allocate territories judiciously among the various tribes, thereby reinforcing His providential care.
Theological Implications
- God’s Sovereignty: The act of dividing land by lot indicates God’s absolute control over the distribution of their inheritance. This teaches us that earthly possessions are under divine jurisdiction.
- Equity Among Tribes: The phrase "between many and few" suggests that regardless of tribe size, God’s plans are equitable. Each tribe receives a fair representation of land, reaffirming that size does not determine value in the Lord’s sight.
Commentary Insights
Matthew Henry Commentary
Matthew Henry emphasizes that the division of land by lot instills a sense of divine order and equitable distribution among different tribes. He notes that this methodology resists possessiveness and rivalry, highlighting the importance of trust in divine providence. He also mentions that by measuring the land, God endows each tribe with a specific place in His grand narrative of redemption.
Albert Barnes' Notes on the Bible
Albert Barnes interprets this verse as a reflection of fairness and the sovereignty of God in His dealings with His people. He points out that the allotment “according to the lot” means that chance or probability does not govern God's decisions; rather, it is a means of fulfilling His promises and maintaining order among His people. Barnes further asserts that this system of allotment was meant to prevent discord among the tribes, securing a harmonious society based on faith and divine providence.
Adam Clarke's Commentary
Adam Clarke delves deeper into the cultural and historical elements of lot casting in biblical times. He observes that this process was common in Israel's history for making critical decisions, signifying reliance on God’s guidance. Clarke highlights that the discerning mechanism of "many and few" might also point to the future complexities of tribe sizes and their respective inheritances, which carry practical implications for stewardship and community relationships.
Application to Contemporary Readers
- Divine Guidance: Modern application emphasizes the need to seek God’s guidance in communal decisions. Whether in church matters, community service, or personal undertakings, believers are encouraged to recognize God’s sovereign hand in guiding their paths.
- Equity in Allocation: This passage challenges contemporary society to contemplate justice and equity in distribution—an important principle in biblical teaching that resonates with social justice themes today.
- Trust in God's Provision: The allocation of land highlights the significance of trusting God’s provision for all needs in life, encouraging believers to rely on His wisdom for personal sustenance and relationships.
Conclusion
Numbers 26:56 encapsulates profound truths regarding God's sovereign plan for His people. Through the act of allotting land, He underscores the principles of equity, trust, and divine guidance. The insights provided by Matthew Henry, Albert Barnes, and Adam Clarke elucidate the theological and practical implications of this passage, reminding readers of the enduring relevance of biblical principles in shaping faith, community, and justice today. As we engage with such texts, may we be inspired to live in a way that honors God’s providence and seeks collective well-being in our spiritual and social spheres.
