Leviticus 16:21 KJV

And Aaron shall lay both his hands upon the head of the live goat, and confess over him all the iniquities of the children of Israel, and all their transgressions in all their sins, putting them upon the head of the goat, and shall send him away by the hand of a fit man into the wilderness:

Previous Verse
« Leviticus 16:20
Next Verse
Leviticus 16:22 »

Leviticus 16:21 Bible Commentary

Commentary on Leviticus 16:21

Text of Leviticus 16:21: "And Aaron shall lay both his hands upon the head of the live goat, and confess over him all the iniquities of the children of Israel, and all their transgressions in all their sins, putting them upon the head of the goat, and shall send him away by the hand of a fit man into the wilderness."

Introduction

This verse is pivotal in understanding the Day of Atonement (Yom Kippur) in the Jewish sacrificial system. It provides a profound insight into the nature of sin, atonement, and the profound imagery of the scapegoat. Notably, this practice not only served as a ritualistic approach to sin but also pointed toward theological truths about redemption and divine forgiveness.

Historical Context

The broader context of Leviticus outlines the Laws given to the Israelites, focusing on holiness and purity. Chapters 16 particularly detail the rituals of the Day of Atonement, a day designated for the high priest to deal with the sins of the people. Aaron, as the appointed high priest, performs these rituals on behalf of the nation.

The Scapegoat

The live goat, often referred to as the scapegoat, carries profound theological symbolism. The word “scapegoat” itself has entered modern vernacular to denote a person or group unjustly blamed for mistakes. Here, however, it represents the handling of sin, illustrating how sins are symbolically transferred from the people to this innocent creature.

Theological Insights

  • Confession of Iniquities: Aaron's laying of hands signifies the transfer of sin. This act is an essential part of the process, echoing the principle that confession precedes the acknowledgment of sin's consequences. As Matthew Henry notes, this signifies the necessity of recognizing one's sinful state before the Lord.
  • Corporate Responsibility: The mention of “all their iniquities” implies a corporate understanding of sin. Adam Clarke emphasizes that the confession encompasses the sins of the entire community, illustrating the collective nature of Israel’s relationship with God.
  • The Concept of Expiation: The act of sending the goat into the wilderness serves as a powerful image of expiation—the removal of sin from the community. Albert Barnes comments that this symbolizes God's mercy and the removal of sin from the midst of His people, reaffirming God’s desire for a relationship untainted by sin.

Practical Applications for Pastors and Theologians

The implications of Leviticus 16:21 extend beyond its historical context and urge contemporary believers to grasp the nature of sin, corporate confession, and the means by which God provides atonement.

  • Cultivating Confession: Pastors can encourage congregational confession, fostering an environment where believers acknowledge their collective need for God’s grace.
  • Understanding Atonement: The imagery of the scapegoat invites deeper theological reflections on atonement. The concept is fully realized in Christ, the ultimate scapegoat, whose sacrifice addresses the sin of humanity (see Hebrews 9:28).
  • Communicating God’s Mercy: This passage highlights God’s readiness to forgive. Emphasizing this in preaching can deepen the understanding of God’s grace and mercy in the lives of believers.

Conclusion

Leviticus 16:21 invites believers into a space of deep reflection upon sin’s impact and the wondrous grace extended through atonement. Both pastors and scholars can draw from this text to understand the rich theological implications it carries, enriching the community's discourse on sin, confession, and divinely provided redemption.

Reflection Questions

  • What does it mean for us today to confess our sins on behalf of our community?
  • How does the imagery of the scapegoat enhance our understanding of Christ’s sacrifice?
  • In what ways can the church today embody the principles of atonement and reconciliation illustrated in this passage?