Luke 3:36 KJV

Which was the son of Cainan, which was the son of Arphaxad, which was the son of Sem, which was the son of Noe, which was the son of Lamech,

Previous Verse
« Luke 3:35
Next Verse
Luke 3:37 »

Luke 3:36 Bible Commentary

Commentary on Luke 3:36

Verse Reference: Luke 3:36

This verse states: "The son of Cainan, the son of Arphaxad, the son of Shem, the son of Noah, the son of Lamech," (Luke 3:36, ESV).

Introduction

In examining Luke 3:36, we delve into a significant genealogical account that traces the lineage of Jesus through multiple generations back to Noah. This passage, while appearing to be a mere list of names, carries profound theological implications regarding the continuity of God's promise and the unfolding of redemptive history.

Significance of Genealogy

Genealogies in Scripture serve several important purposes:

  • Establishing Identity: They authenticate the messianic claims of Jesus as both the Son of David and the Son of God.
  • Demonstrating Fulfillment of Prophecy: They illustrate the fulfillment of Old Testament prophecy concerning the lineage of the Messiah.
  • Highlighting God’s Faithfulness: Every name represents a story of faithfulness, failure, and God’s unbroken covenant with His people.

Commentary from Public Domain Sources

Matthew Henry's Analysis

Matthew Henry emphasizes the importance of tracing the lineage of Christ back to significant figures such as Noah. He notes that Noah is a pivotal figure in God’s covenantal plan. Henry highlights the redemption narrative that runs from Noah through to Christ, indicating that Noah's faithfulness preserved humanity's hope of salvation.

Albert Barnes’ Insights

Albert Barnes focuses on the connection between Cainan and the preceding ancestors listed. He clarifies that Cainan, although not mentioned in the Septuagint directly, plays a critical role in understanding the chronology of biblical history. Barnes posits that each name in this genealogy reflects God's unfolding plan of redemption, culminating in the birth of Jesus, the Savior.

Adam Clarke’s Perspective

Adam Clarke brings attention to the theological implications of this genealogy. He notes that tracing back to Noah signifies a restoration of humanity. Clarke argues that Noah's lineage reaffirms God’s promise of redemption not only for the Jewish people but for all humanity, thus emphasizing God's universal plan of salvation through Christ.

Theological Reflections

The genealogy in Luke 3:36 serves as a reminder of the hope and continuity in God’s plan for humanity.

  • The Universality of Salvation: The mention of Noah underscores the idea that Christ’s salvation extends beyond Israel to all nations, fulfilling the promise made to Abraham that through him all families of the earth will be blessed.
  • Divine Providence: Each name represents a generation in which God’s providence is at work, ensuring the continuation of His redemptive plan through human history.
  • Faithfulness Amidst Failure: The complex histories of these biblical figures highlight that God’s purposes prevail even through human flaws and failures.

Conclusion

As we reflect on Luke 3:36, we are reminded of the steadfastness of God's promises and the intricate tapestry of His redemptive plan throughout history. The genealogy serves not merely as a record but as a testament to God’s faithfulness in bringing forth the Messiah through a chosen lineage. For pastors, students, theologians, and scholars, these insights invite deep contemplation of God's work in both historical and contemporary contexts.