Commentary on Job 15:2

Verse Text: "Should a wise man answer with windy knowledge, and fill his belly with the east wind?" (Job 15:2, KJV)

Introduction

The verse under consideration is a part of Eliphaz’s second discourse to Job. As he responds to Job's lamentations and assertions of his integrity, Eliphaz moves into a critique of what he perceives as Job's misguided knowledge and understanding of righteousness. The language of "windy knowledge" serves to emphasize the emptiness of Job's arguments from Eliphaz's perspective, illustrating a key theme in the psalms of wisdom literature that encourages robust and meaningful dialogue, especially in times of suffering.

Insights from Public Domain Commentaries

Matthew Henry’s Commentary

Matthew Henry, in his exposition of this text, suggests that Eliphaz is accusing Job of speaking foolishly. He emphasizes the dangers of ungrounded assertions and “windy knowledge.” Such discourse, Henry posits, is more of an ostentation than a genuine contribution to understanding the divine providence in suffering. The metaphor of "filling the belly with the east wind" denotes the futility of Job's words, as the east wind in Hebrew thought represented barrenness and destruction, illustrating that Job's response was as fruitless as this wind.

Albert Barnes’ Notes on the Bible

Albert Barnes offers a detailed analysis that delves into the implication of the phrase, "Should a wise man answer..." He explains that it presupposes an expectation of wisdom to be accompanied by sound reasoning. Job’s appeal to his own righteousness and integrity was seen by Eliphaz as a vain attempt to justify his situation, thus warranting this rhetorical question. Barnes notes the importance of wisdom being coupled with humility, where a truly wise man should refrain from engaging in empty arguments that do not bring glory to God or true understanding to humanity. He underscores the importance of truth over speculative notions when navigating suffering and advocating for discernment in discussions about divine justice.

Adam Clarke’s Commentary

Adam Clarke also highlights the metaphor of the "east wind" and expands upon its cultural undertones. He describes that within the ancient Near East, the east wind was known for its hot and destructive qualities, often leading to drought and desolation in crop-growing regions. Clarke suggests that Eliphaz's invocation of this wind vividly represents the barrenness of Job's theological arguments in his current distress. Clarke points out that rather than allowing hardship to lead to a deeper understanding of God's nature, Eliphaz perceives Job's response as a deviation into irreverence and existential complaint without basis in wisdom or understanding.

Theological Implications

• Critique of False Wisdom: Both Henry and Barnes present a strong admonition against false wisdom. In the pursuit of theological truths, it is crucial that believers refrain from using emotional anguish as an excuse to promulgate misguided ideas about God and His actions.
• Suffering and Righteousness: The wider context of Job’s plight raises essential questions about the relationship between suffering and righteousness. Eliphaz’s rebuke of Job implies a conventional wisdom that ties suffering directly to sin, a motif that reverberates throughout the Book of Job.
• The Need for Genuine Dialogue: This verse signifies the importance of sincere discourse surrounding theological questions. The language of wisdom, as advocated by these commentators, should seek not to escalate conflict but to bring clarity and comfort to the suffering believer.

Conclusion

In conclusion, Job 15:2 serves as a poignant reminder of the necessity for depth, humility, and soundness in the face of adversity. Eliphaz’s words caution against the tendency to speak forth unfounded theories or arguments, particularly in situations of pain and suffering. Rather, the verse compels scholars, students, and pastors alike to examine their understanding of God's nature and the complexities of the human condition in light of divine wisdom. The public domain commentaries viewed provide a multi-faceted approach to the text, offering insights that continue to resonate with contemporary audiences engaged in theological reflection.