Commentary on Matthew 12:14

Verse: "But the Pharisees went out and plotted against Him, how they might destroy Him."

Introduction

This verse serves as a poignant illustration of the conflict between Jesus and the religious leaders of His time. It reflects the growing tension that culminates in the Passion narrative. Throughout the Gospel of Matthew, we see a consistent theme of opposition to Jesus' ministry, particularly from the Pharisees—a group known for their strict adherence to the Law and traditions.

Contextual Background

Matthew 12 is a critical chapter that delineates the ministry of Jesus, marked by miraculous healings and significant teachings. In this context, the opposition from the Pharisees escalates as they are confronted with the authority and power of Christ. Understanding the historical and cultural backdrop of the Pharisees' actions can provide deeper insight.

1. The identity of the Pharisees

The Pharisees were a sect of Judaism notable for their emphasis on ritual purity and strict interpretation of the Law. Matthew Henry notes that they were zealous for the Law but often missed the broader divine principles of mercy and compassion that the Law intended to uphold.

2. The intent of their plotting

As noted by Albert Barnes, the Pharisees' plotting against Jesus reveals their deep-seated fear of losing power and influence. They perceive Jesus’ teachings as a direct challenge to their authority and the intricate system of laws they had established.

The Significance of the Plot

In this verse, we observe a shift from public opposition to clandestine plotting, indicating the seriousness of their intent. The term "plotted" (Greek: sumbouleuō) suggests a calculated and secretive plan, emphasizing their determination to eliminate what they perceived as a threat.

1. Theological implications

Adam Clarke points out that this plotting illustrates the conflict between light and darkness, with Jesus as the embodiment of truth. The plot foreshadows the ultimate rejection and crucifixion of Christ, a pivotal moment in the Christian narrative where human sin and divine sovereignty intersect.

2. The nature of opposition to Christ

This verse can serve as a mirror reflecting the nature of opposition faced by the church and its leaders today. Matthew Henry comments on how such hostility can arise from those who claim to uphold religious values, yet act contrary to the spirit of the Gospel.

Applications for Today

For pastors, theologians, and students of scripture, Matthew 12:14 serves as a reflection on the nature of spiritual warfare and the challenges posed when truth confronts tradition. Here are some thought-provoking applications:

• Identifying contemporary 'Pharisees': It calls for discernment in recognizing modern-day resistance to the Gospel, which may arise not only from secular influences but also from within religious circles.
• The call to compassion: Jesus exemplifies a ministry of mercy, contrasting the Pharisees’ rigid legalism. This narrative encourages believers to embody love and grace in their ministry.
• Resilience in opposition: Jesus’ response to the hostility provides a model for followers facing resistance. He did not retreat but continued to minister and fulfill His purpose despite the danger.

Conclusion

Matthew 12:14 encapsulates the rising tension between Jesus and the Pharisees and sets the stage for the events leading to the crucifixion. This conflict is not merely a historical account but a continual narrative that challenges believers to evaluate their own hearts and the motivations behind their actions in upholding or opposing the teachings of Christ. As they reflect on this scripture, pastors and students alike are reminded of the importance of love, mercy, and the pursuit of truth within the life of faith.