Commentary on Daniel 11:37

Text of Daniel 11:37: "Neither shall he regard the God of his fathers, nor the desire of women, nor regard any god: for he shall magnify himself above all."

Introduction

The verse in question is part of a larger prophetic discourse in the Book of Daniel, particularly concerning the rise and character of a powerful figure often interpreted as an antichrist or a foreshadowing of such a figure. The implications of this verse are vast and require a multi-faceted approach drawing from various commentaries to grasp the full weight of its meaning.

Historical Context

Daniel 11 is largely recognized for its detailed prophecy about the succession of empires and their respective rulers leading up to the end times. This specific verse speaks to the traits and motivations of a ruler whose reign is marked by rebellion against divine authority and a rejection of traditional values.

Insights from Matthew Henry

Matthew Henry emphasizes the moral depravity of the ruler described in this verse. He notes that this leader will show a total disregard for the God of his fathers, which implies a rejection of his heritage and ancestral faith. He writes:

"This marks not only the infidelity of his heart but the ungodliness of his life; he shall break off with his religion, his ties to family piety and the respect due to the worship of God."

Henry also comments on the phrase "nor the desire of women," suggesting that it may indicate a lack of respect for marriage and the traditional family, pointing to an eventual moral decline. This characterizes a ruler who elevates himself to an unprecedented level of pride and self-importance.

Analysis by Albert Barnes

Albert Barnes offers a profound examination of the interpretive possibilities surrounding this verse. In his commentary, he concurs with Henry, emphasizing that the ruler "shall magnify himself above all." This self-aggrandizement likely reflects a spirit of total autonomy and rebellion against any form of submission to divine authority.

"He disregards the customs and the deities that were held dear in his lineage and the reverence typically accorded to familial and divine authority."

Barnes further examines the implications of the phrase "nor regard any god," indicating a universal rebellion against established religious practices. He concludes that such a ruler envisions himself as supreme, labeling not only the decline of faith but a critical turning point in eschatological events.

Adam Clarke's Perspective

Adam Clarke brings a distinct focus on the psychological and philosophical aspects of the ruler described in this verse. He proposes a radical departure from cultural norms and an embrace of an unrestrained, egotistical worldview, stating:

"In pursuing his ambition, he shall cast away every principle that binds humanity to the divine; this delusion of self-sufficiency places him against not just traditional God but higher moral order."

Clarke also notes the sociocultural dynamics present, particularly the phrase concerning the "desire of women," which could allude not just to personal relationships but a broader societal contempt for values associated with family and morality.

Theological Implications

Across all commentaries, a common thread emerges highlighting the theological significance of this verse. This ruler serves as a figure illustrating human pride's culmination and its stand against divine authority.

• Rejection of God: The affirmation that he will "regard no god" demonstrates a full and conscious rebellion against the Creator, reflecting ancient Israel's journey from monotheism into apostasy.
• Moral Decline: The disregard for traditional values, symbolized by the desire of women, is a serious indicator of a society in moral freefall, warning readers of the consequences of abandoning familial and societal norms.
• Self-Magnification: The elevation of self over divine authority illustrates the core of idolatry, presenting a powerful commentary on the nature of sin and its implications in human governance.

Practical Applications

For pastors and theologians, this verse serves as a sobering reminder of the potential for absolute power to corrupt absolutely. In modern-day contexts, we must be vigilant about leaders who display similar traits:

• Examine the accountability structures in leadership positions to avoid unchecked power.
• Encourage community norms that respect divine principles to combat moral relativism.
• Teach the importance of familial structures in nurturing faith and community cohesion.

Conclusion

Daniel 11:37 profoundly encapsulates the dangers of pride and the rejection of divine authority, warning against the moral decline that arises when leaders elevate themselves above all. By synthesizing insights from Matthew Henry, Albert Barnes, and Adam Clarke, we achieve a comprehensive understanding of this verse's implications for both ancient and contemporary readers. The insights gleaned challenge us to remain vigilant in the face of leadership that embodies such characteristics, while also reaffirming the necessity of grounding ourselves in the truths of Scripture.