Matthew 27:34 KJV

They gave him vinegar to drink mingled with gall: and when he had tasted thereof, he would not drink.

Previous Verse
« Matthew 27:33
Next Verse
Matthew 27:35 »

Matthew 27:34 Bible Commentary

Commentary on Matthew 27:34

This verse reflects a significant moment in the crucifixion narrative, where Jesus, facing unparalleled suffering, is offered wine mixed with gall. Understanding this passage requires examining its context, symbolism, and theological implications. Below is a comprehensive summary drawn from historical Christian commentaries, specifically those of Matthew Henry, Albert Barnes, and Adam Clarke.

Verse Context and Meaning

Matthew 27:34 states:

"They gave him vinegar to drink mingled with gall: and when he had tasted thereof, he would not drink." (KJV)

This moment occurs during the lead-up to the crucifixion of Jesus. Here, the Roman soldiers, as noted by various commentators, show a blend of mockery and cruelty by offering him a narcotic drink intended to dull the pain.

Commentary Insights

  • Matthew Henry's Commentary

    Matthew Henry emphasizes the nature of the drink offered to Jesus. He notes that gall symbolizes bitterness, and its mention serves to highlight the intensifying suffering of Christ. Henry remarks on the irony of the moment, showing that while the world sought to numb His pain, Jesus willingly faced it fully. This decision speaks to the depth of His sacrifice and the fulfillment of prophecy, as aligning with Psalms 69:21, where it speaks of receiving vinegar and gall for thirst.

  • Albert Barnes' Notes

    Albert Barnes illustrates that the vinegar (or sour wine) was a common Roman drink, used to refresh soldiers during long hours. However, he highlights that the mixture with gall was meant to insult and humiliate Jesus. According to Barnes, Jesus’ rejection of the drink reaffirms His commitment to suffer without mitigation; He embraced the full extent of human suffering without seeking relief, fulfilling His purpose as the atoning sacrifice for sin. This emphasizes His role in undergoing the horrors of sin and death.

  • Adam Clarke's Commentary

    Adam Clarke provides deeper insight into the psychological implications of this moment. He emphasizes the significance of Jesus' refusal to drink the offered mixture. Clarke interprets this as a deliberate act to endure and experience the fullness of suffering for humanity. By not accepting the relief, Clarke suggests that Jesus showed His ability to handle the full weight of sin and death, furthering His mission of redemption. Additionally, he explains that the terms used in the original Greek denote more than mere physical suffering but encapsulate the spiritual anguish Jesus bore.

Theological Implications

As scholars and theologians reflect on Matthew 27:34, several key theological themes emerge:

  • The Nature of Suffering: The passage raises critical reflections on human suffering and Christ's role in it. His refusal illustrates the holistic engagement with pain and anguish, pointing to the Christian understanding of suffering as part of the redemptive narrative.
  • Fulfillment of Prophecy: The act of being offered vinegar with gall is seen as a direct fulfillment of Old Testament prophecies, further affirming the continuity of Scripture and God's sovereign plan.
  • Christ’s Humanity: This moment emphasizes the true humanity of Christ. By tasting the bitterness of gall and refusing the pain-numbing drink, He demonstrates that He fully immerses Himself in the human experience, making Him the perfect mediator between God and humanity.
  • Redemptive Suffering: The refusal of the drink becomes a powerful symbol of Jesus' willingness to bear the weight of sin without any relief, thus connecting His suffering to the broader theme of atonement.

Practical Applications

For pastors, students, and theologians, engaging with Matthew 27:34 presents opportunities for practical application:

  • Reflection on Suffering: The passage invites believers to consider how they respond to suffering in their lives and the lives of others. Drawing from Christ's example, they are encouraged to face challenges with an understanding of purpose and redemptive potential.
  • Understanding Christ’s Sacrifice: A deeper comprehension of the significance of Jesus' choices during His suffering can foster a more profound appreciation of the grace provided through His sacrifice.
  • Ministry to the Suffering: This commentary invites pastors to craft messages that address the reality of human suffering while pointing to the hope found in Christ, encouraging congregants to find strength in their trials as they follow Jesus' example.

Conclusion

Matthew 27:34 serves as a poignant reminder of the depth of Jesus' sacrifice and His willingness to endure unquantifiable pain for the sake of humanity. Through the insights of Matthew Henry, Albert Barnes, and Adam Clarke, we are better equipped to understand the profound theological truths in this verse, encouraging a more enriched faith experience rooted in the reality of Christ’s suffering and love.