Commentary on Matthew 26:24
Verse Context: Matthew 26:24 states, "The Son of Man goes as it is written of him: but woe to that man by whom the Son of Man is betrayed! It would have been good for that man if he had not been born." This verse is a solemn pronouncement regarding the betrayal of Jesus by Judas Iscariot, highlighting the grave consequences of this act.
Significance of the Son of Man
Matthew Henry: Jesus refers to Himself as the "Son of Man," a title that emphasizes both His humanity and His Messianic role. This phrase indicates His voluntary submission to sufferings and His identification with the human condition. It signifies that His impending sacrifice was foretold and part of divine prophecy.
Albert Barnes: The term "Son of Man" is rooted in the Old Testament, particularly in Daniel 7:13-14, where it describes a figure given dominion and authority. Thus, Jesus' usage of this title also underscores His authority in foreseeing the betrayal.
Woe to the Betrayer
Matthew Henry: The "woe" pronounced upon Judas indicates the immense moral weight and the unfathomable sorrow linked to betraying the Son of God. This pronouncement serves as a stern warning to all readers, reminding them of the serious consequences of turning away from Christ.
Adam Clarke: Clarke reflects on the depth of this woe, suggesting that it indicates the everlasting regret Judas would face. The regret for choosing temporal gain over eternal blessings draws attention to the nature of sin and its destructive potential.
The Prophetic Nature of Betrayal
Albert Barnes: "As it is written of him" alludes to Old Testament prophecies concerning the Messiah's suffering (e.g., Psalm 41:9). This emphasizes that Judas' actions were part of a predetermined plan, fulfilling scriptural prophecy while simultaneously holding Judas responsible for his choice.
Matthew Henry: This notion reinforces the theological concept of God's sovereignty even amid human actions. God's plan encompasses even the darkest betrayals, showcasing His ultimate authority and purpose.
The Consequence of Betrayal
Adam Clarke: The phrase "it would have been good for that man if he had not been born" highlights the severe consequence of Judas' betrayal, indicating the eternal separation from God that comes from such a choice. Clarke argues that this measure of regret is a cautionary tale, echoing the weight of choosing temporal ambitions over eternal life.
Matthew Henry: This statement underscores the gravity of sin and its inevitable consequences. Betraying Christ is not merely an act of disobedience but a fundamental misalignment with God’s will and purpose, leading one to a path of irreversible destruction.
Theological Implications
Matthew Henry: The verse serves as an epitome of the struggle within the Church; it warns believers against complacency and the spiritual dangers of betrayal. It directly calls for self-examination, inquiring if one's intentions align with God’s purpose.
Albert Barnes: The theological implications extend beyond the narrative of betrayal; they challenge believers to reflect on their allegiance to Christ. The danger of betrayal exists for anyone who would choose the world over Christ, a reminder to be vigilant and steadfast in faith.
Conclusion
The words of Jesus in Matthew 26:24 resonate with profound meaning, serving both as a prophecy and a warning. They highlight the dual themes of divine foreknowledge and human accountability. The solemnity of this passage calls upon pastors, students, theologians, and scholars to ponder not only the historical event of betrayal but also its relevancy in contemporary faith practices. The woe pronounced over Judas serves as a perpetual reminder of the grave consequences tied to one's choices regarding Christ.
